Introduction

Role of the parties

Role of judge

Contentious matters

Concept

Powers of the judge

Principle of adversarial proceedings

Non-contentious matters

Underlying principles of civil proceedings

Right to bring civil action

Abuse of the right to bring proceedings

Type of action

Concept of action

Interest in bringing proceedings

Standing

Rules governing action

Legal action

Initial claim

Counterclaim

Additional claim

Intervention

Incidental claim

Interruption of limitation period

Application to file suit (demande en justice)

Defense on the merits

Procedural objections (exceptions de procédure)

Procedural bars to admissibility (fins de non-recevoir)

Defenses

Nature of claim

Amount of the claim

Jurisdiction ratione materiae

Principles

Exceptional territorial jurisdiction

Extension of jurisdiction

Territorial jurisdiction

Competent court

Formal requirements

Substantive requirements

Presentation of the QPC (Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité)

Referral to Court of Cassation

Referral to Constitutional Council

Referral of the QPC

Investigation procedure

Conduct of hearing

Decision of the Constitutional Council

Proceedings before Constitutional Council

Priority question of constitutionality (QPC)

Simplified case preparation procedure

Participative procedure for case preparation purposes

Extra-judicial case preparation

Recourse to technical expert

Agreements on extra-judicial case preparation (mise en état)

Disclosure of exhibits

Production of documents

Exhibits

Common provisions for investigations

Rules specific to each investigation

Investigative measures

Disputes concerning private deeds (actes sous seing privé)

Forgery procedure against authentic instruments

Challenges to documentary evidence

Oath sworn as decisive evidence

Oath tendered by way of supplementation

Judicial oath

Administration of evidence

Hearings

Deliberations

Judgment

Formation

Judgment after adversarial proceedings

Judgment by default or judgment after trial

Contentious or non-contentious judgment

Judgment on the merits or provisional ruling (avant dire droit)

Combined judgment

Provisional judgment

Judgment in fast track proceedings

Types

Joinder and severance of proceedings

Interruption of proceedings

Suspension of proceedings

Discontinuance of proceedings (extinction)

Procedural incidents

Plea of lack of jurisdiction

Recusal/Dismissal for legitimate suspicion

Challenging the judge's competence

General rules

Voluntary intervention

Compulsory intervention

Joinder in proceedings (intervention)

Existence of a judgment

Same subject matter, cause, and parties

Authority of res judicata

General conditions of enforcement

Provisional enforcement

Grace period

Enforcement of the judgment

Bearing of costs

Order to pay non-recoverable costs

Verification/Recovery

Claims/Disputes

Costs and expenses

Ordinary remedies

Extraordinary remedies

Remedies

Judgments

Calculation of time-limits

Acts of judicial commissioners

Service of documents

Ordinary notification

Notification between lawyers

International notification

Place of notification

Notification

Communication by electronic means

Procedural acts

1. Ordinary Law of Civil Procedure

When the court does not have sufficient elements to resolve a dispute requiring the intervention of a specialist, it may appoint any person of its choice to provide clarification (Art. 232 CPC). The Code of Civil Procedure provides for three investigative measures that can be carried out by a specialist: findings (Art. 249 to 255), consultation (Art. 256 to 262), and expert assessment (Art. 263 to …

Principle

When the court does not have sufficient elements to resolve a dispute requiring the intervention of a specialist, it may appoint any person of its choice to provide clarification (Art. 232 CPC). The Code of Civil Procedure provides for three investigative measures that can be carried out by a specialist: findings (Art. 249 to 255), consultation (Art. 256 to 262), and expert assessment (Art. 263 to 284-1).

The technician is distinct from the amicus curiae or friend of the court, who is an authoritative figure in a field of activity, whose expertise or knowledge can usefully inform the court on the resolution of the dispute. The court may invite them to provide general observations on the points it determines. They may submit their observations in writing, in which case they must be disclosed to the parties, or be heard during a hearing to which the parties are summoned (Art. 1015-2 CPC). Furthermore, unlike the amicus curiae, who is called upon to voluntarily express an opinion on a general issue , the technician is intended to address a specific technical question to inform the court and is remunerated for doing so.

Investigative measures carried out by a specialist are governed by standard rules and rules specific to each of them.

Paris, 16 October 1992, LawLex202300006057JBJ; Cass. com., 20 January 2015, LawLex201500000061JBJ; 12 September 2018, LawLex201800001297JBJ.

1. Ordinary Law of Civil Procedure

156. Principle

Demandez un accès gratuit
au contenu exclusif Livv – juristes d’entreprise

Les décisions de justice citées dans ce paragraphe :

Sous parties

Les notions juridiques connexes

156. Principle

Demandez un accès gratuit au contenu exclusif Livv – juristes d’entreprise

Les décisions de justice citées dans ce paragraphe :

Sous parties

Les notions juridiques connexes

Demandez un accès gratuit
au contenu exclusif Livv – juristes d’entreprise